{"ok":true,"province":"insulation","name":"断熱材（種類）","name_en":"Insulation Material Finder","level":1,"criteria":[{"id":"ins_perf","label":"断熱性能（熱伝導率の低さ）","label_en":"Thermal performance","direction":"higher","description":"熱伝導率λが小さい＝同じ厚みでよく効くほど高評価","unit":null,"kind":"fact"},{"id":"ins_cost","label":"初期費用の安さ","label_en":"Low initial cost","direction":"higher","description":"材料費＋施工費が安いほど高評価","unit":null,"kind":"editorial"},{"id":"ins_fire","label":"防火・耐熱性","label_en":"Fire resistance","direction":"higher","description":"燃えにくく有毒ガスが出にくいほど高評価","unit":null,"kind":"editorial"},{"id":"ins_moisture","label":"耐水・防湿性","label_en":"Moisture resistance","direction":"higher","description":"水や湿気で性能が落ちにくいほど高評価","unit":null,"kind":"editorial"},{"id":"ins_settle","label":"経年安定（へたりにくさ）","label_en":"Long-term stability","direction":"higher","description":"沈下・収縮しにくく寸法が安定するほど高評価","unit":null,"kind":"editorial"},{"id":"ins_eco","label":"環境・健康・施工性","label_en":"Eco and handling","direction":"higher","description":"自然素材・低VOC・扱いやすさが高いほど高評価","unit":null,"kind":"editorial"}],"items":[{"id":"ins_glasswool","name":"グラスウール","name_en":null,"provider":"繊維系（無機）","jurisdiction":"JP","note":"リサイクルガラスを繊維化。最も普及し安価で不燃。湿気に弱く防湿施工が前提。高性能品でλ0.038前後","note_en":null,"url":"https://www.glass-fiber.net/","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"ins_perf":70,"ins_cost":95,"ins_fire":90,"ins_moisture":40,"ins_settle":55,"ins_eco":65},"facts":[],"sources":{"ins_perf":"国土交通省 断熱材区分・熱伝導率 (2026-06)","ins_cost":"editorial: 最も普及した量産品で材料が安く大工が自分で充填できるので、初期費用の安さは候補7種で最上位のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_fire":"editorial: 原料がガラスの無機繊維で燃えず有毒ガスも出にくい不燃材で、防火性はロックウールに次ぐため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_moisture":"editorial: 繊維の間に湿気が入ると断熱が落ち、防湿施工を前提とする素材で、耐水性は候補7種で最も下のため低め（2026-06初評）","ins_settle":"editorial: 柔らかい綿状で壁の中でずり落ちや隙間が起きやすく、施工精度に左右されるので候補下位のため中位の下（2026-06初評）","ins_eco":"editorial: リサイクルガラスが原料で再資源化に向くが、施工時に繊維が肌を刺すので二番手どまりのため中位の上（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"ins_rockwool","name":"ロックウール","name_en":null,"provider":"繊維系（無機）","jurisdiction":"JP","note":"玄武岩等を繊維化。不燃で耐熱が高く吸音も得意。撥水品もあるが繊維系で湿気対策は必要。λ0.038前後","note_en":null,"url":"https://www.rwa.gr.jp/seihin/zyuutaku/zyuutaku_hikaku-top.html","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"ins_perf":70,"ins_cost":80,"ins_fire":98,"ins_moisture":50,"ins_settle":70,"ins_eco":65},"facts":[],"sources":{"ins_perf":"国土交通省 断熱材区分・熱伝導率 (2026-06)","ins_cost":"editorial: 鉱物を繊維化した量産品で充填施工も手軽だが、グラスウールよりは材料費が高く二番手のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_fire":"editorial: 玄武岩などの岩石を溶かした繊維で耐熱温度がとても高く不燃、防火性は候補7種で最上位のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_moisture":"editorial: 撥水品もあるが繊維系で内部に湿気が入れば性能が落ち、防湿層は欠かせず発泡系に譲るため中位（2026-06初評）","ins_settle":"editorial: グラスウールより密度が高く形が崩れにくいが、繊維系ゆえ板状の発泡系ほどは安定しないためやや高め（2026-06初評）","ins_eco":"editorial: 岩石や製鉄の副産物が原料で化学物質の放散は少ないが、繊維の刺激があり二番手の並びのため中位の上（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"ins_cellulose","name":"セルロースファイバー","name_en":null,"provider":"繊維系（自然）","jurisdiction":"JP","note":"新聞古紙を再生しホウ酸処理。調湿・吸音に優れる自然素材。吹込み施工費が高く沈下対策が要る。λ0.040前後","note_en":null,"url":"https://cellulosefiber.jp/","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"ins_perf":65,"ins_cost":55,"ins_fire":60,"ins_moisture":45,"ins_settle":50,"ins_eco":90},"facts":[],"sources":{"ins_perf":"国土交通省 断熱材区分・熱伝導率 (2026-06)","ins_cost":"editorial: 専用機械で吹き込む専門施工が必要で施工費が高くつき、初期費用の安さは候補下位のため中位の下（2026-06初評）","ins_fire":"editorial: 紙が原料だがホウ酸処理で燃え広がりにくく表面が炭化して止まる性質で、無機系に次ぐ中ほどのため中位（2026-06初評）","ins_moisture":"editorial: 湿気を吸って吐く調湿性はあるが水濡れそのものには弱い紙の繊維で、耐水性は候補下位のためやや低め（2026-06初評）","ins_settle":"editorial: 吹き込んだ綿が年月で自重により沈みやすく密度管理などの沈下対策が要り、候補7種で最も下のため中位の下（2026-06初評）","ins_eco":"editorial: 新聞古紙を再生した自然素材で調湿と吸音にも優れ、環境と健康の面は候補7種で最上位のため高め（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"ins_eps","name":"ビーズ法ポリスチレンフォーム（EPS）","name_en":null,"provider":"発泡プラ系","jurisdiction":"JP","note":"発泡スチロール。軽く吸水が少なく安価。熱や炎に弱い。λ0.034〜0.043","note_en":null,"url":"https://www.jepsa-eps.jp/","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"ins_perf":72,"ins_cost":75,"ins_fire":25,"ins_moisture":80,"ins_settle":80,"ins_eco":50},"facts":[],"sources":{"ins_perf":"国土交通省 断熱材区分・熱伝導率 (2026-06)","ins_cost":"editorial: 発泡スチロールとして大量生産され軽くて切りやすく施工も楽なので、安さは繊維系二種に次ぐため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_fire":"editorial: ポリスチレンは熱で溶け炎に弱い素材で、防火性は押出法と並び候補7種で最も下のため低め（2026-06初評）","ins_moisture":"editorial: 粒を固めた独立気泡で吸水は少ないが、粒の隙間がある分だけ押出法や吹付け系に譲り四番手のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_settle":"editorial: 成形された板で繊維のように沈まず寸法が変わりにくく、経年の安定は押出法に次ぐ二番手のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_eco":"editorial: 軽くて加工しやすい反面、石油由来の樹脂で自然素材ではなく、環境・施工性は候補の中ほどのため中位（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"ins_xps","name":"押出法ポリスチレンフォーム（XPS）","name_en":null,"provider":"発泡プラ系","jurisdiction":"JP","note":"吸水が極めて少なく基礎・床下・水回りに強い。炎に弱い。λ0.028前後","note_en":null,"url":"https://www.epfa.jp/","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"ins_perf":85,"ins_cost":65,"ins_fire":25,"ins_moisture":95,"ins_settle":85,"ins_eco":40},"facts":[],"sources":{"ins_perf":"国土交通省 断熱材区分・熱伝導率 (2026-06)","ins_cost":"editorial: 板状の量産品だが同じポリスチレンのビーズ法より高性能な分だけ値が上がり、安さは候補四番手のため中位の上（2026-06初評）","ins_fire":"editorial: 炎に弱いポリスチレン樹脂で熱で溶けて燃えるので、防火性はビーズ法と並び最も下のため低め（2026-06初評）","ins_moisture":"editorial: 連続押出しの緻密な独立気泡で水をほとんど吸わず基礎や床下にも使われ、耐水性は候補最上位のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_settle":"editorial: 硬く緻密な板で圧縮にも強く、沈下や収縮が起きにくいので、経年の安定は候補7種で最上位のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_eco":"editorial: 石油由来の樹脂を発泡剤でふくらませた素材で燃えると煙も出やすく、環境・健康面は候補7種で最も下のため低め（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"ins_urethane","name":"硬質ウレタンフォーム","name_en":null,"provider":"発泡プラ系","jurisdiction":"JP","note":"現場吹付けで隙間なく施工でき気密が取りやすい。λ0.023〜0.029。可燃で施工は専門業者向き","note_en":null,"url":"https://www.urethane-jp.org/","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"ins_perf":88,"ins_cost":50,"ins_fire":30,"ins_moisture":85,"ins_settle":75,"ins_eco":45},"facts":[],"sources":{"ins_perf":"国土交通省 断熱材区分・熱伝導率 (2026-06)","ins_cost":"editorial: 現場吹付けは専門業者の機材と手間が要り施工費がかさむので、初期費用の安さは候補下位のため中位の下（2026-06初評）","ins_fire":"editorial: 可燃の樹脂で火がつくと燃え広がりやすく、防火性はポリスチレン系二種をわずかに上回る下位のため低め（2026-06初評）","ins_moisture":"editorial: 吹付けで下地に隙間なく密着し湿気の通り道を作りにくく、耐水性はフェノールと並ぶ二番手のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_settle":"editorial: 下地に接着して固まるのでずり落ちないが、年月でわずかに収縮することがあり三番手のためやや高め（2026-06初評）","ins_eco":"editorial: 石油由来で現場発泡に専門の装備が要り、自分では扱えない素材で、環境・施工性は候補下位のためやや低め（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"ins_phenolic","name":"フェノールフォーム","name_en":null,"provider":"発泡プラ系","jurisdiction":"JP","note":"実用断熱材で最高クラスの低λ0.019〜0.022。薄く高断熱だが高価。自己消火性あり","note_en":null,"url":null,"shop_url":null,"metrics":{"ins_perf":95,"ins_cost":35,"ins_fire":70,"ins_moisture":85,"ins_settle":70,"ins_eco":50},"facts":[],"sources":{"ins_perf":"国土交通省 断熱材区分・熱伝導率 (2026-06)","ins_cost":"editorial: 薄く高断熱な高性能ボードで材料単価が高く、初期費用の安さは候補7種で最も下のため低め（2026-06初評）","ins_fire":"editorial: 熱で溶けず炭化する樹脂で自己消火性があり、発泡プラ系では際立つが無機繊維には及ばず三番手のためやや高め（2026-06初評）","ins_moisture":"editorial: 緻密な独立気泡の板で水を吸いにくく、耐水性は硬質ウレタンと並び押出法に次ぐ二番手のため高め（2026-06初評）","ins_settle":"editorial: 硬い板で沈下はしないがやや脆く欠けやすい面もあり、経年の安定はロックウールと並ぶ中ほどのためやや高め（2026-06初評）","ins_eco":"editorial: 薄く済むので納まりは楽だが合成樹脂製で自然素材ではなく、環境・施工性はEPSと並ぶ中ほどのため中位（2026-06初評）"}}],"profiles":[{"id":"ins_budget","name":"予算優先タイプ","name_en":"Budget","weights":{"ins_perf":0.15,"ins_cost":0.4,"ins_fire":0.1,"ins_moisture":0.1,"ins_settle":0.1,"ins_eco":0.15}},{"id":"ins_highperf","name":"高断熱・省エネ最優先タイプ","name_en":"High performance","weights":{"ins_perf":0.45,"ins_cost":0.1,"ins_fire":0.1,"ins_moisture":0.15,"ins_settle":0.15,"ins_eco":0.05}},{"id":"ins_fireproof","name":"防火・安全重視タイプ","name_en":"Fire safety","weights":{"ins_perf":0.2,"ins_cost":0.1,"ins_fire":0.4,"ins_moisture":0.1,"ins_settle":0.1,"ins_eco":0.1}},{"id":"ins_moist","name":"結露・湿気対策タイプ","name_en":"Moisture-proof","weights":{"ins_perf":0.2,"ins_cost":0.1,"ins_fire":0.05,"ins_moisture":0.4,"ins_settle":0.15,"ins_eco":0.1}},{"id":"ins_eco","name":"エコ・自然素材タイプ","name_en":"Eco","weights":{"ins_perf":0.2,"ins_cost":0.1,"ins_fire":0.1,"ins_moisture":0.1,"ins_settle":0.1,"ins_eco":0.4}}],"articles":[{"slug":"choose-insulation-material-2026","title":"断熱材の選び方2026：種類別の性能・コスト・防火を一枚で","dek":"グラスウールからフェノールフォームまで。熱伝導率・費用・防火・湿気で迷わない早見表＋判定エンジン。"}],"terms":[],"campaigns":[]}