{"ok":true,"province":"tooth-replacement","name":"歯の補綴（インプラント／ブリッジ／入れ歯）","name_en":"Tooth Replacement (Implant / Bridge / Denture)","level":1,"criteria":[{"id":"tr_longevity","label":"寿命・長持ち","label_en":"Longevity","direction":"higher","description":"10年・20年と長く使えるほど高評価。やり直し（再治療）の少なさ。","unit":"score","kind":"fact"},{"id":"tr_adjacent","label":"隣の歯を守る（削らない）","label_en":"Protecting adjacent teeth","direction":"higher","description":"両隣の健康な歯を削ったり負担をかけたりしないほど高評価。","unit":"score","kind":"editorial"},{"id":"tr_chewing","label":"噛む力・機能性","label_en":"Chewing function","direction":"higher","description":"天然歯に近い噛み心地・噛む効率が得られるほど高評価。","unit":"score","kind":"editorial"},{"id":"tr_cost","label":"費用の軽さ","label_en":"Affordability","direction":"higher","description":"初期費用・総額が安く、保険が使えるほど高評価。","unit":"score","kind":"editorial"},{"id":"tr_lowinvasive","label":"体への負担の少なさ","label_en":"Low invasiveness","direction":"higher","description":"手術や大きな歯の切削が不要なほど高評価。","unit":"score","kind":"editorial"},{"id":"tr_ease","label":"手入れ・通院の手軽さ","label_en":"Ease of care","direction":"higher","description":"日々の手入れや通院・メンテの負担が少ないほど高評価。","unit":"score","kind":"editorial"}],"items":[{"id":"tr_implant","name":"単独インプラント","name_en":null,"provider":"固定式（外科）","jurisdiction":"日本","note":"あごの骨に人工歯根（チタン）を埋め、その上に人工歯を装着。隣の歯を削らず、噛む力も天然歯に近い。自由診療で高額・手術が必要。","note_en":null,"url":"https://www.shika-implant.org/publication/guide/","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"tr_longevity":95,"tr_adjacent":95,"tr_chewing":92,"tr_cost":25,"tr_lowinvasive":35,"tr_ease":70},"facts":[],"sources":{"tr_longevity":"systematic review: 10年生存率96.4% (Howe 2019, J Dent)","tr_adjacent":"editorial: 人工歯根で独立して支えるため両隣の歯を削らず負担もかけないとされ、候補中最上位のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_chewing":"editorial: 骨に固定するため天然歯に近い噛む力の回復に優れるとされ、候補中最上位の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_cost":"editorial: noteに『自由診療で高額』とあり保険適用の型と比べ総額がかさみ、候補中最下位級のため低め（2026-06初評）","tr_lowinvasive":"editorial: 人工歯根をあごの骨に埋める外科手術が必要とされ、非外科で済む入れ歯・ブリッジと比べ低め（2026-06初評）","tr_ease":"editorial: 固定式で毎日の着脱は不要だが定期メンテナンスが前提とされ、候補中では負担が軽い側のため高め（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"tr_bridge_hoken","name":"ブリッジ（保険・金属）","name_en":null,"provider":"固定式","jurisdiction":"日本","note":"両隣の歯を削って土台にし、橋をかけるように人工歯を固定。保険適用で安価・短期間だが、健康な歯を削る必要がある。","note_en":null,"url":"https://kennet.mhlw.go.jp/information/information/dictionaries/teeth.html","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"tr_longevity":70,"tr_adjacent":25,"tr_chewing":80,"tr_cost":80,"tr_lowinvasive":65,"tr_ease":62},"facts":[],"sources":{"tr_longevity":"systematic review: 歯支持ブリッジ10年生存〜89% (Pjetursson 2007)","tr_adjacent":"editorial: noteに『両隣の歯を削って土台にし』とあり健康な歯への不可逆な切削を伴うため候補中最も低め（2026-06初評）","tr_chewing":"editorial: 固定式で装着中のずれが少なく噛みやすいとされ、インプラントに次ぐ上位の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_cost":"editorial: noteに『保険適用で安価・短期間』とあり初期費用を抑えやすく、候補中最上位のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_lowinvasive":"editorial: 外科手術は不要だが土台の歯の切削は不可逆とされ、着脱式より低く手術型より高い中位（2026-06初評）","tr_ease":"editorial: 固定式で着脱の手間はないが橋の下の清掃に注意が必要とされ、候補中では中ほどのため中位（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"tr_bridge_cera","name":"ブリッジ（自費・セラミック）","name_en":null,"provider":"固定式","jurisdiction":"日本","note":"構造は保険ブリッジと同じだが、セラミック等で見た目・適合性が高い。自由診療で高額。土台の歯は削る。","note_en":null,"url":"https://kennet.mhlw.go.jp/information/information/dictionaries/teeth.html","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"tr_longevity":80,"tr_adjacent":25,"tr_chewing":85,"tr_cost":35,"tr_lowinvasive":60,"tr_ease":68},"facts":[],"sources":{"tr_longevity":"editorial: 自費セラミックは適合性が高く長持ちしやすい傾向とされ、候補中上位の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_adjacent":"editorial: noteに『土台の歯は削る』とあり構造は保険ブリッジと同じ切削を伴うため候補中最も低め（2026-06初評）","tr_chewing":"editorial: 固定式で安定し適合性も高いとされ、保険ブリッジを上回りインプラントに次ぐため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_cost":"editorial: noteに『自由診療で高額』とあり、保険適用のブリッジや入れ歯と比べ費用がかさむため低め（2026-06初評）","tr_lowinvasive":"editorial: 外科手術は不要だが土台の歯の切削は不可逆とされ、非外科かつ削らない着脱式より低い中位（2026-06初評）","tr_ease":"editorial: 固定式で毎日の着脱が不要で、入れ歯型より日々の手入れの負担が軽いとされるため高め（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"tr_partial_hoken","name":"部分入れ歯（保険）","name_en":null,"provider":"取り外し式","jurisdiction":"日本","note":"残った歯にバネ（クラスプ）をかけて固定する着脱式。保険適用で安く手術不要だが、バネが見えやすく噛む力は劣る。","note_en":null,"url":"https://kennet.mhlw.go.jp/information/information/dictionaries/teeth.html","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"tr_longevity":55,"tr_adjacent":60,"tr_chewing":55,"tr_cost":78,"tr_lowinvasive":85,"tr_ease":55},"facts":[],"sources":{"tr_longevity":"editorial: バネや床の緩みで調整・作り直しが必要になりやすいとされ、候補中では中ほどの水準のため中位（2026-06初評）","tr_adjacent":"editorial: 歯は削らないがバネをかける歯に負担がかかるとされ、削るブリッジより上・独立支持より下の中位（2026-06初評）","tr_chewing":"editorial: 着脱式は固定式より安定感で劣り噛む効率が下がるとされ、候補中では下位寄りのため低め（2026-06初評）","tr_cost":"editorial: noteに『保険適用で安く手術不要』とあり初期費用を抑えやすく、保険ブリッジと並ぶ上位で高め（2026-06初評）","tr_lowinvasive":"editorial: 入れ歯は非外科で早く歯も削らないとされ、体への負担が候補中で最も軽い側の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_ease":"editorial: 毎日の着脱と清掃が欠かせないとされ、固定式と比べて日々の手間が多くなる水準のため低め（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"tr_partial_jihi","name":"部分入れ歯（自費・金属床/ノンクラスプ）","name_en":null,"provider":"取り外し式","jurisdiction":"日本","note":"金属床で薄く丈夫、またはバネの目立たないノンクラスプタイプ。自由診療で見た目・装着感が良い。","note_en":null,"url":"https://kennet.mhlw.go.jp/information/information/dictionaries/teeth.html","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"tr_longevity":65,"tr_adjacent":65,"tr_chewing":65,"tr_cost":35,"tr_lowinvasive":85,"tr_ease":65},"facts":[],"sources":{"tr_longevity":"editorial: 金属床は薄く丈夫とされ保険の型より持ちが期待される一方、固定式の上位には及ばないため中位（2026-06初評）","tr_adjacent":"editorial: 歯を削らない着脱式でバネの負担も設計で抑えやすいとされ、ブリッジ型を上回る水準のため中位（2026-06初評）","tr_chewing":"editorial: 金属床で安定が向上し保険入れ歯より噛みやすいとされる一方、固定式には及ばないため中位（2026-06初評）","tr_cost":"editorial: noteに『自由診療』とあり、保険適用の入れ歯・ブリッジと比べ費用がかさむため低め（2026-06初評）","tr_lowinvasive":"editorial: 非外科で歯を削らない着脱式とされ、体への負担が候補中で最も軽い側の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_ease":"editorial: 着脱清掃は必要だがバネが目立たず装着感が良いとされ、保険入れ歯より扱いやすいため中位（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"tr_full","name":"総入れ歯（全部床義歯）","name_en":null,"provider":"取り外し式","jurisdiction":"日本","note":"歯がすべて失われた顎に装着する着脱式。手術不要で保険も使えるが、噛む力・安定性は天然歯に大きく劣る。","note_en":null,"url":"https://kennet.mhlw.go.jp/information/information/dictionaries/teeth.html","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"tr_longevity":50,"tr_adjacent":75,"tr_chewing":40,"tr_cost":78,"tr_lowinvasive":85,"tr_ease":50},"facts":[],"sources":{"tr_longevity":"editorial: 顎の粘膜や骨の変化で合わなくなり調整・作り直しを要するとされ、候補中最下位のため低め（2026-06初評）","tr_adjacent":"editorial: 残った歯のない顎に用いるため他の歯を削る・負担をかける余地がなく、独立支持型に次ぐため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_chewing":"editorial: 粘膜で支える構造のため噛む力は天然歯に大きく劣るとされ、候補中最下位の水準のため低め（2026-06初評）","tr_cost":"editorial: noteに『保険も使える』とあり費用を抑えやすく、保険の入れ歯類と並ぶ上位の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_lowinvasive":"editorial: 手術も歯の切削も不要な着脱式とされ、体への負担が候補中で最も軽い側の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_ease":"editorial: 毎日の着脱清掃に加え安定性の課題で調整の通院も要るとされ、候補中最下位のため低め（2026-06初評）"}},{"id":"tr_iod","name":"インプラントオーバーデンチャー","name_en":null,"provider":"取り外し式＋インプラント","jurisdiction":"日本","note":"数本のインプラントで入れ歯を固定。総入れ歯より格段に安定し噛みやすいが、手術と費用が必要。","note_en":null,"url":"https://www.shika-implant.org/publication/guide/","shop_url":null,"metrics":{"tr_longevity":80,"tr_adjacent":80,"tr_chewing":75,"tr_cost":25,"tr_lowinvasive":35,"tr_ease":58},"facts":[],"sources":{"tr_longevity":"editorial: インプラントで義歯を固定するため緩みにくく長く安定しやすいとされ、候補中上位のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_adjacent":"editorial: インプラント支持で残った歯を削らず負担もかけにくいとされ、単独インプラントに次ぐため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_chewing":"editorial: noteに『総入れ歯より格段に安定し噛みやすい』とあり、固定式に近い上位の水準のため高め（2026-06初評）","tr_cost":"editorial: noteに『手術と費用が必要』とありインプラントと義歯の両方の費用がかかり候補中最下位級で低め（2026-06初評）","tr_lowinvasive":"editorial: 数本のインプラント埋入に外科手術が必要とされ、非外科で済む入れ歯・ブリッジと比べ低め（2026-06初評）","tr_ease":"editorial: 義歯の着脱清掃に加えインプラント部の手入れも必要とされ、候補中では中ほどのため中位（2026-06初評）"}}],"profiles":[{"id":"tr_longterm","name":"長く使いたい","name_en":"Want it to last","weights":{"tr_longevity":0.35,"tr_chewing":0.2,"tr_adjacent":0.15,"tr_cost":0.1,"tr_lowinvasive":0.1,"tr_ease":0.1}},{"id":"tr_preserve","name":"隣の歯を守りたい","name_en":"Preserve neighbors","weights":{"tr_adjacent":0.35,"tr_longevity":0.2,"tr_chewing":0.15,"tr_cost":0.1,"tr_lowinvasive":0.1,"tr_ease":0.1}},{"id":"tr_budget","name":"費用を抑えたい","name_en":"Budget-conscious","weights":{"tr_cost":0.4,"tr_longevity":0.15,"tr_chewing":0.15,"tr_adjacent":0.1,"tr_lowinvasive":0.1,"tr_ease":0.1}},{"id":"tr_nosurgery","name":"手術を避けたい","name_en":"Avoid surgery","weights":{"tr_lowinvasive":0.4,"tr_cost":0.2,"tr_ease":0.15,"tr_chewing":0.1,"tr_adjacent":0.1,"tr_longevity":0.05}},{"id":"tr_chewwell","name":"しっかり噛みたい","name_en":"Chew firmly","weights":{"tr_chewing":0.4,"tr_longevity":0.25,"tr_adjacent":0.1,"tr_cost":0.1,"tr_lowinvasive":0.05,"tr_ease":0.1}}],"articles":[{"slug":"choose-tooth-replacement-2026","title":"失った歯をどう補う？インプラント・ブリッジ・入れ歯の選び方","dek":"1本失っただけでも放置はNG。3つの選択肢を「寿命・隣の歯・噛む力・費用」で見比べる。"}],"terms":[],"campaigns":[]}